Stephen King, author of 70+ novels and short story collections, is almost as famous for the 30+ adaptations of his stories as for the books themselves.
America’s dark Disney: How Stephen King conquered the screen – The Independent
“There are conventions and stylistic choices that he makes in his work that tap into a very core sense of the human psyche,” Apicella explains. “You’re willing to go into this crazy paranormal stuff, because at the heart of it is something we’ve all experienced, whether it’s coming of age, or financial hardship. He’s brave enough to unpack what frightens us in the most extensive and imaginative way.”
Back in 2017, I set myself the task of reading Stephen King’s It again, after a 30 year gap, before I saw the latest version with Bill Skarsgård and co. In fact, the original driver was to re-read the book before I read this wonderfully cutting/draining book review/reading journal, before I saw the film.
Reading Stephen King’s It is an exhausting way to spend a summer – The Verge
Now is probably a good time to point out that Stephen King is out of control. There is no way an editor even glanced at this book before it was published. It took 350 pages for the seven main characters (too many!) to individually meet the central monster and then collectively acknowledge its existence, and we frequently took extended breaks to talk about architecture.
But by the time I finished the book, I had had my fill of it and didn’t bother watching the film. And still haven’t. I might get round to it.
Anyway, I only mention this now as it’s just happened again.
Wanting something hefty to read during the first coronavirus lockdown this summer I turned to King’s The Stand, that cheery tale of survival in a post-pandemic world that I first waded through in the late 80s. It seemed to be the right thing to do.
Pandemics from Homer to Stephen King: what we can learn from literary history – The Conversation
Literature has a vital role to play in framing our responses to the COVID-19 pandemic. It is worth turning to some of these texts to better understand our reactions and how we might mitigate racism, xenophobia and ableism (discrimination against anyone with disabilities) in the narratives that surround the spread of this coronavirus. Ranging from the classics to contemporary novels, this reading list of pandemic literature offers something in the way of an uncertain comfort, and a guide for what happens next.
I’ve finally got to the end of its 1,152 pages and have learnt that, after having had my fill of it all, a new adaptation is on its way, one that I’m — yet again — in no rush to see.
The 5 most challenging parts of adapting The Stand – Polygon
In a case of what could be considered great or terrible timing, depending on how you look at it, CBS All Access’ The Stand will arrive smack dab in the middle of an actual global pandemic. Will people flock to a show dramatizing a similar (albeit far more deadly) pandemic story when a real one has kept them locked in their homes for nine months?
‘The Stand’ doesn’t play by the book – Rolling Stone
This new version has its inspired moments, like the way Billy Joel’s “The Stranger” somehow turns out to be the perfect theme song for Flagg, but the structure keeps sucking the life out of things, from major characters to more minor ones. The unhinged pyromaniac who calls himself Trashcan Man appears in a parallel narrative throughout the book before playing a huge role in its climax; here (played in suitably off-kilter fashion by Ezra Miller), he doesn’t turn up until the season is more than halfway done. Without the connective tissue, presented in the proper order, little of what we see feels like it matters.
Will this be something to watch if/when it works its way onto a channel I can access? Perhaps I need to wait 30 years again.
3 thoughts on “Will it Stand up?”
I tried to watch The Stand years ago when that TV adaptation came out…hated the book and hated the show found both so depressing! I’m surprised you waded through it twice. I find his books too dark to get into, but that’s just personal preference
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes I know what you mean. I think the thing I sometimes struggle with, with his books, is how realism mixes with the supernatural; if you have one, how can you have the other? That’s a failing on my part though, I think.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yeah I think it is a failing, this combination of realism and the supernatural. It seems a bit contrived. I never really enjoyed his novels for this reason either. I really respect him as a writer, he has achieved greatness, but I never really liked his books as I don’t like the horror genre in general unless it’s classic horror like Dracula or Frankenstein. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person